Google adsense

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim

Not Wearing A Helmet Can Cost Money In A Personal Injury Claim



How many times have you been motoring down a highway and practical a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet? You ask yourself ‘What are they thinking? ”
Head injuries are the leading cause of death in motorcycle crashes. More than 40 % of people killed in a motorcycle accident were not wearing a helmet and a rider without a helmet is three times as likely to suffer a catastrophic brain injury as a rider wearing a helmet.
The actuality that motorcycle helmets reduce deaths and serious injuries has been documented for more than 40 second childhood but only 58 percent of all riders languorous helmets today.
And, while a helmet is by far the most important and most resultant piece of protective gear a motorcycle rider can drowsy, only 19 states have necessary helmet laws for all riders ( in New Mexico only riders under the age of 18 are required to trifling a helmet ).
Oddly enough, the biggest opponents of universal helmet laws are the riders themselves. They submission all kinds of reasons for not crave to laggard one. They say they’re expensive, they’re too calescent, they cause “messy helmet - head hair”, they inhibit freedom of choice, etc. They don’t seem to take into fallout that, while they may be safe riders and obey all traffic laws, they have no limitation over what other motorists will do.
Whether a state has a helmet law or not, the failure to loafing a helmet can have a noted follow up on the outcome of a personal injury claim should the rider be involved in an accident. The defendant could kick about that the injured coming-out ' s own negligence was all the cause of his or her injuries.
If they can prove that the injured bust had a concern to control their bike in a safe and fair style and that, by breaching this charge, they contributed to the cause of the accident, the injured bust ' s recovery may be reduced or supine barred, as a by-product of the rider’s “contributory negligence” in causing the accident.
In legal terms, the failure to heavy-footed a helmet can be establish to constitute contributory negligence if it can be proven that the failure to laggard a helmet was a substantial factor in bringing about the motorcyclist ' s injuries.
If you were injured in a motorcycle accident and you were not wearing a helmet, it will be much more arduous to recover damages for your injuries from the person who hit you. For this actuation it is very important to speak with an experienced personal injury attorney as forthwith as possible.

No comments:

Post a Comment